Would jesus have gone to a gay wedding

No matter what a government may sanction, the biblical definition of marriage see Gen. Premise 2: A gay wedding celebrates and solemnizes a lie. The public act of bowing had a recognizably public meaning, whatever their private intentions or whatever private conversations could have taken place. Their intentions may be to love the bride or groom without in any way celebrating what is taking place.

Based on this reasoning, then, we might conclude that Christians should have no problem attending a gay wedding, even if they do not. In today’s episode, Becket talks with biblical scholar, Robert Gagnon, about whether or not Christians should attend a gay wedding. If invited to a gay wedding, it is our conviction that a believer in Jesus Christ should respectfully decline and find other ways to express love, respect, and care.

Conclusion: Therefore, Christians ought not to attend a gay wedding. The reason for the public event is so that friends and family members can join in the celebration of what is taking place. Return to: Questions about Life Decisions Should a Christian attend a gay wedding?. In a very real sense, He had to step outside of His comfort zone in order to communicate God’s love to her.

But can those private intentions be known to others who see our public attendance? Monique points out that no one asks whether they should attend a wedding if the bride or groom have been having sex before the wedding, or if the bride or groom have lusted or been addicted to porn, or whether it is a second marriage for the couple?. If this or something like it is the context for the admonitions to Pergamum and Thyatira, we have another reason to steadfastly avoid participating in a public event where the god of Eros is implicitly honored above and in place of the God of the Bible.

This is where many good Christians disagree, even if they agree with the first two premises, so let me expand on this point. We can lay out the case in three premises and a conclusion. A post with a very interesting question caught my attention today. Attending a gay wedding does not take place outside of a larger web of cultural meaning. And therein I found these quotes from Jesus himself: Woe to you, teachers of the law. If invited to a gay wedding, it is our conviction that a believer in Jesus Christ should respectfully decline and find other ways to express love, respect, and care.

I think Paul forbids eating any meat that was knowingly used in pagan worship. For Jesus, as a first-century Jewish man, it may not have been entirely convenient or comfortable to engage this woman in conversation. Premise 3: Attendance at a gay wedding bears public witness to the purported goodness of what is taking place in that public event. It seems to me that attending a gay wedding—with the inevitable singing, and clapping, and rice-throwing, and cheering, and hugging at the receiving line—is more like participating in an ungodly ritual than eating the meat that was previously used in the ritual.

So—what with being Christian and all—I asked myself the famous question, “What would Jesus do?” (Which I don’t too often ask. Jesus has absolutely no problem doing things with sinners. Whether the service is done in a church or in a reception hall, whether it is meant to be a Christian service or a secular commitment ceremony, a gay wedding declares what is false to be true and calls evil good.

Based on this reasoning, then, we might conclude that Christians should have no problem attending a gay wedding, even if they do not agree with it. Jesus in his pastoral engagements hardly ever.

There is no legal reason people need to have a wedding ceremony. John Shore asked the question, "What would Jesus do if invited to a gay wedding?" While he didn't directly answer as to whether Jesus would attend, he did ponder as to whether he himself would attend or not. I’ve recently been invited to a couple of gay weddings. Wondering what Jesus would do if he were invited to a gay wedding naturally led me to the New Testament.

A wedding is a public event that entails each one in attendance bearing public witness. Having outlined the basic case against attending a gay wedding, let me address three common objections to the argument just stated. Objection 2: Christians should show compassion and build bridges with unbelievers. But at the very least, we know that Paul opposes any involvement in the practices that take place in pagan temples.

Beyond one or two witnesses, there is no requirement by the state to make the joining of two persons in matrimony a public event. Do you have a particular struggle in one area that is identified in this list? In today’s episode, Becket talks with biblical scholar, Robert Gagnon, about whether or not Christians should attend a gay wedding.

Of course, Christians want to extend love and keep the door open for gospel conversations, but surely this good desire is not by itself a sufficient moral framework for making ethical decisions. The exegesis is complicated, and not every commentator agrees on what Paul is forbidding and what he is allowing. The case against Christians attending a gay wedding is relatively straightforward. The way he answers this important question is surprising and.

Christians can in no way support or celebrate a union that is an offense to God and is, in fact, no marriage whatsoever.